Re: The Petrovian Gallery

by Kingdom Come Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:38 pm

nana seems a little transparent dont ya think?

by **Zephron©** Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:42 pm

That isn't Nana in the sig Kingdom. She isnt even in the sig. It's just another Popo.

You can tell because Nana would be pink.

I'd critique it Petro, but I'd honestly just repeat myself. 0 lighting, meh composition, it's too big, dont like the c4d at the bottom... and I dont like the transparent popo either.

by petrovich112 Thu Nov 27, 2008 12:11 am

like i said i got stuck and btw there is lighting its just not super dark or bright anywhere

by **Zephron©** Thu Nov 27, 2008 12:15 am

No offense, but it seems the same color of lighting everywhere throughout the sig, and if you're referring to the smash marks popo is making that is not lighting.

The lighting doesn't have to be dramatic like in my sig but it by no means should be absent.

by petrovich112 Thu Nov 27, 2008 12:51 am

the lighting is coming from the bottom left. it doesnt effect the bottom layer though, the shadowing on popo is done by me btw

by **Zephron©** Thu Nov 27, 2008 12:57 am

Thats just transparency, not shadowing... but whatevs.

And I have no clue how thats lighting... it looks non existent... @_@

I'll never get GIMP..

by **GuruKid** Thu Nov 27, 2008 1:50 am

Regarding your Popo sig:

I really like the background, but really not liking the semi-transparent Popo nor whatever it is that Popo is smashing (what is it?)

Perhaps you can also add an impact effect for the hammer; I can sense a motion motif going on there; an impact visual between the hammer and the... purple ice... as well as some motion lines behind the hammer may help out a bit.

by Fyro Thu Nov 27, 2008 11:02 am

I think the thing that Popo is smashing....Is...The purple fruit that appears in the IC stage.

by Sponsored content